Skip to main content

Analysis and Comparison of an I-Beams Structural Stability

Introduction

The shape of an I-beam has long been considered to be the most structurally stable for the amount of material it uses.

Because of this, I-beams are frequently used in projects that relate to civil engineering, such as buildings and bridges. Considering I-beams have been used for decades in the construction industry to prevent buildings and bridges from collapsing under their own weight, why is it that these I-beams were made in the shape of an ‘I' in the first place? In this experiment, the ‘I' shape of the I-beam was put to the test and its structural stability was analyzed through a three point bending test simulation performed using SolidWorks Simulation.

I-beam was then compared to the structural stability of several other shapes, including a billet, a circular rod, a triangular rod, and a slab, in order to determine whether or not the I-beam truly is as efficient at resisting bending as it's renowned to be.

Billet

Cross Section: Billet Cross Section

Forces Applied: Billet Forces

Static Displacement: Billet Static Displacement Study

Stress: Billet Stress Study

Strain: Billet Strain Study

Circular Rod

Cross Section: Circular Rod Cross Section

Forces Applied: Circular Rod Forces Applied

Static Displacement: Circular Rod Static Displacement Study

Stress: Circular Rod Stress Study

Strain: Circular Rod Strain Study

Slab

Cross Section: Slab Cross Section

Forces Applied: Slab Forces Applied

Static Displacement: Slab Static Displacement Study

Stress: Slab Stress Study

Strain: Slab Strain Study

I-Beam

Cross Section: I-Beam Cross Section

Forces Applied: I-Beam Forces Applied

Static Displacement: I-Beam Displacement Study

Stress: I-Beam Stress Study

Strain: I-Beam Strain Study